There are several bits of D&O Discourse news to share:
1. I hope that you can attend conferences at which I’m speaking this fall:
- I am co-chairing ACI’s D&O Liability Forum in New York City on September 17-18, and moderating a panel discussing significant securities litigation developments. Readers of D&O Discourse can receive a discount off the current price. Please email me: email@example.com.
- I am co-chairing and speaking on a panel discussing board oversight of cybersecurity at a meeting of the National Association of Corporate Directors, Northwest Chapter, in Seattle on October 20, 2015.
2. The ABA is accepting nominations for the list of the Top 100 Law Blogs. If you are so inclined, I’d be grateful for your nomination of D&O Discourse. Nominations are due by the end of the day on August 16. Here is the link to the nomination page. Thank you.
3. We continue to try to make D&O Discourse as useful as possible. We now have three features:
- The D&O Discourse blog itself: In the blog, we provide opinion about key issues in the law and practice of securities and corporate governance litigation and SEC enforcement. We write an opinion-based piece roughly monthly.
- Twitter: Because the D&O Discourse blog doesn’t attempt to chronicle current events, we started a Twitter feed to identify current developments that we think would be most important to our readers. You can follow us by reading our Twitter feed on the left-hand side of the D&O Discourse blog, or on Twitter, @DandODiscourse.
- LinkedIn: We recently set up a special LinkedIn page, where we publish thoughts that are too long for Twitter but too short for a blog post. Here is an example:
“In writing my 2014 year-in-review piece, it occurred to me that the judicial environment for securities and corporate governance litigation seems about as neutral as it has been in a long time. We’ve seen streaks of decisions that feel pro-plaintiff or pro-defendant, driven in part by judicial skepticism caused by the waves of corporate scandals since Enron and WorldCom. But over the past year or so, the decisions feel pretty even. The 2nd Circuit / 9th Circuit split over whether omission of matters covered by Item 303 of S-K can be actionable epitomizes the current judicial environment.”
Here is a link to our LinkedIn page. Please click “Follow” to receive updates in your LinkedIn feed.
4. In the upcoming issue of the PLUS Journal, my partner Claire Davis and I are publishing an article about the importance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Omnicare, based on one of our D&O Discourse blog posts. As our readers know, Claire and I wrote an amicus brief that shaped the Supreme Court’s Omnicare opinion.
We hope you enjoy the rest of your summer.